Legal Opinion

Dow v. Shoe Corp. of America

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided September 16, 1959No. Civ. A. No. 2568PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

POOS, District Judge.

This cause was previously submitted to the Court upon the original complaint which complaint the Court held failed to state a cause of action. Thereupon the plaintiff, John Dow, filed an amended complaint in which the complaint, by Count III, alleged that at all times hereinafter mentioned defendant, Mid-States Shoe Company, was and is now a corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of Wisconsin, doing business as the House of Crosby Square; that Mid-States Shoe Company is engaged primarily in the advertising, promotion and sale of shoes; that…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Carney v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Heaman v. E. N. Rowell Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. McClellan v. SanfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Lewis v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  5. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. John Dow v. Shoe Corporation of America, Mid-States Shoe Company, a Wisconsin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API