Legal Opinion
State v. Kennedy
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 28, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
Peter Kennedy appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Mead, J.) following a jury verdict finding him guilty of the charge of operating with excessive blood-alcohol level or under the influence, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B (Pamph. 1994). Kennedy contends that the trial court erred by admitting in evidence an incomplete blood-alcohol test, and erred by not providing specific instructions as to how to evaluate expert testimony. We conclude that the trial court neither abused its discretion by its admission of the incomplete blood-alcohol test, nor issued…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- State v. McConveySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- State v. IlsleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. BrannonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- State v. PineoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- State v. PoulinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5677, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,115, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7883 United States of America v. Kevin Vincent BrannonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998