Legal Opinion

Haven v. Beidler Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1879PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Kent. Trover. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated.

1Opinion of the CourtCoqley, J.

This is an action of trover to recover the value of certain logs. The logs were cut on lands formerly owned by one Parmenter, and sold by him to Stickney and Stone by executory contract bearing date October 20, 1873. By this contract Stickney and Stone were to pay $3,400 in certain specified instalments, the last of which was to be paid in three years from the date of the contract. They were also to pay the taxes, and not to cut or remove any timber from the lands until all payments were made. October 24, 1874, Parmenter conveyed the .land to plaintiff, subject to the Stickney and Stone…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hickey v. BairdMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Stickney v. ParmenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank of Vandalia v. MainesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  2. Thomas China Co. v. C. W. Raymond Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
  3. Lewis v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Souvais v. LeavittMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. DeYampert v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API