Lara v. State

OPINION

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

MORRISON, Judge.

On original submission, this case was affirmed by per curiam opinion because no grounds of error were set forth by brief in compliance with Article 40.09, V.A.C.C.P.

Appellant was represented by retained counsel. No question of indigency was raised in the record on original submission. In a supplemental transcript forwarded to this Court by the trial court since the rendition of our original opinion, we note the following colloquy between the court and counsel at the time of sentencing regarding the question of indigency:

“COURT: (To Mr.…