Legal Opinion

Martinez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 19, 1972No. 71-1316PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

By this appeal we are called upon to review the propriety of a conviction and sentence [eighteen months in the State penitentiary and five years’ probation], entered after a nolo contendere plea to certain charges alleging a violation of the narcotics laws of this State.

We have examined the points on appeal raised by the appellant and find them to be without merit. However, the court, sua sponte, notes that a portion of the sentence, placing the appellant on probation, is an illegal sentence [Robinson v. State, Fla.App.1972, 256 So.2d 390] and said sentence be and the same is hereby modified…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sturn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. Owens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API