Smith v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
MORROW, Judge.
— It seems that proper recognizance was taken
by the court, but improperly recorded by the clerk. The motion to reinstate appeal is granted. Assuming that this court has jurisdiction to consider the appeal on its merits, the following remarks are made:
The manner of the preparation of the statement of facts renders it extremely difficult for this court to comprehend the state of the evidence adduced upon the trial. In the document before us, are colloquies between court and counsel, and numerous objections to the particular phases of the evidence. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gaunce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Soderman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Glasser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Eason v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.