Finch v. . Slater
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendants from tbe refusal of Ooolce, J., at November Terra, 1909., of ’W'ilsoN, to allow defendants’ motion to vacate an attachment on their property.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
This action was brought for the recovery of $500, alleged to be due by the defendant, Millard Slater, to' the plaintiffs. A warrant of attachment was issued and levied upon a fund in the hands of W. D. P. Sharp, sheriff. The defendant, through his counsel, entered a special appearance and moved to dismiss the attachment because of defects in the affidavit and, further, because there had been no service of process, either personally or by publication. The court refused to vacate the attachment, and the defendant excepted and appealed.
It has been settled by decisions of this Ctfurt that an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Warlick v. H. P. Reynolds & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Sheldon v. . KivettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Judd v. Crawford Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Raisin Fertilizer Co. v. GrubbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jenette v. Hovey & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Connolly v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Durant v. Brown Motor CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Suskin v. Maryland Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Thrush v. ThrushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957