Legal Opinion

Buckingham v. Eitel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 7, 1928No. 3499Published

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above). By the terms of the statute in force at the time appellee Fears applied for the writ of certiorari (article 746, Vernon’s Sayles’ Statutes) he was not entitled to the writ unless he had in his application there for stated facts showing “either the justice of the peace had not jurisdiction, or that injustice was done to the applicant by the final determination of the suit or proceeding, and that such injustice was not caused by his own inexcusable neglect.” I-Ie stated no such facts in his application, and he therefore was not entitled to have the writ…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crenshaw v. Home Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Frazier v. CoombsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API