Legal Opinion

Clair Marcelle, Inc. v. Agfa Ansco Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The facts which defendant now urges as a basis for reversal of the orders appealed from were not before the court at Special Term on the original motion or upon the motion for reargument. They were set forth in an affidavit submitted by defendant in opposition to the motion to resettle the order theretofore entered so as to provide for a day certain upon which the cause was to be restored to the calendar for trial. We are of the opinion that upon the proof presented the court was empowered to grant the relief obtained by plaintiff.

It furthers appears that the costs imposed by Special Term…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goepel v. . Kurtz Action Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Metzler v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. James v. OuimetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. James v. PowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  3. Eckerly v. LAKE REGION SIGN COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. Colvin v. GoldenbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API