Legal Opinion

American Holding Corp. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 1, 1930No. 3316Published

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court.

*276Merchandise, consisting of mechanical devices, essentia] units or parts of a motion-picture projection mechanism, was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of Chicago as mountings or frames-for projection lenses at 45 per centum ad valorem under paragraph. 228 of the Tariff Act of 1922.

Par. 228. Azimuth mirrors, sextants, and octants; photographic and projection lenses, opera and field glasses, telescopes, microscopes, and other optical instruments, and frames and mountings for the same; all the foregoing not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  3. Lietz Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  4. Thomas Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API