Legal Opinion

Sedwick v. Blaney

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1955No. Appeal, No. 142PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

Plaintiffs are owners of lots purchased from a common grantor, the heirs of H. E. Montgomery. The east side of the lots abut on a roadway the use of which was specifically granted plaintiffs in their respective deeds. Defendants own lots on the other side of the roadway and abutting thereon. The latter were purchased from Grant Zellefrow who bought from H. E. Montgomery by deed making no reference to any roadway. Plaintiffs sought to enjoin defendants from using the roadway. The court below granted the relief prayed for and entered an appropriate decree. Defendants’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rahn v. HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Quicksall v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Versailles Township Authority v. McKeesportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Snyder v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coffin v. Old Orchard Development Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Vendetti AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Ott v. Locust Lake Village, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1972
  4. Romberger v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API