Legal Opinion

Mercer County v. Cantelupe (Et Al.)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 1941No. Appeal, 39; Appeal, 41; Appeal, 50; Appeals, 38, 40 and 65PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

The legal problem presented in this case arises from the misappropriation by a tax collector of funds collected by him during a number of successive years in which he held office and the practice he adopted of attempting to cover the shortage in one year by applying thereto collections of the following year. The result is a dispute among the sureties on his bonds as to the proper method of apportionment of their liability for the loss. The public agencies for which the collections were made are also vitally interested in the determination of this question.

Joseph…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Zeigler's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Trestrail v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. York County v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Commonwealth v. ReitzelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
  5. Lackawanna County's AppealsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. County of Somerset v. GeorgeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API