People v. Berrios
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed. Defendant’s primary argument on this appeal, that evidence of a prior assault on the victim was not admissible to negate the anticipated defense of accident, was not raised in the trial court and therefore is not preserved for our review. Defendant’s remaining contentions, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, are without merit.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
2Cited by17 opinions
- People v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. DolphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. BessardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Mathews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.