Legal Opinion

Naumoski v. Bernacet

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 2003No. 45A03-0303-CV-90PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellants-defendants Viado Naumoski, Great American Lines, Inc., Independent Contractors Leasing Corporation, and AFA Enterprises (collectively, "Naumo-ski") appeal the trial court's granting of appellees-plaintiffs Miguel and Janet Ber-nacet's Motion to Correct Errors. Specifically, Naumoski contends that the trial court should not have granted a new trial where a juror's affidavit stated that another juror voiced his personal knowledge of the location of the traffic accident that was involved in this litigation. Finding that the trial court properly admitted the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Conrad v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Ward v. St. Mary Medical Center of GaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hall v. Eastland MallIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Wedge v. Lipps Industries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. South Bend Clinic, Inc. v. KistnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buckner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Levetta Tunstall v. Dawn ManningIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Levetta Tunstall v. Dawn ManningIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API