Legal Opinion
Clay v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided October 28, 1999No. CIV. A. 99-D-1006-NPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DE MENT, District Judge.
Before the court are Plaintiff Mary Clay’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion To Remand and Brief In Support Of Motion To Remand (“PL’s Br.”), filed October 5, 1999. On October 20, 1999, Defendants Philip Morris, Inc. (“Philip Morris”) and Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. (individually and as successor by merger to The American Tobacco Co.) (“Brown & Williamson”) filed their Memorandum Of Law In Opposition To Plaintiffs Motion To Remand, which the court construes as a Response (“Resp.”). On October 26, 1999, Plaintiff filed a Response To Defendants’…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Jacqueline Burns v. Windsor Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jones v. Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- Brenda D. Tillman v. R. J. Reynolds TobaccoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Brenda D. Tillman v. R. J. Reynolds TobaccoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001