Legal Opinion

Manson v. Board of Levee Commissioners

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1934No. 14656PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Judge.

Plaintiff, as riparian owner, claims from the defendant the sum of $1,350 for the val-lue of alluvion, sand, or soil alleged to have been removed from the batture, or banks of the Mississippi river, by the defendant, and sold to third persons for private use.

The defenses were as follows:

First, a denial that the plaintiff was the owner of the property, defendant claiming ownership under a previous appropriation of and payment for the property, in the case of Manson v. Board of Levee Commissioners, 154 La. 995, 98 So. 555, citing, in support of this defense, Boyce Cottonseed Oil…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Municipality No. 2 v. Orleans Cotton PressSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
  2. Boyce Cottonseed Oil Mfg. Co. v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  3. Peart v. MeekerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
  4. Remy v. Municipality Number TwoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
  5. Pulley & Erwin v. Municipality No. 2Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1841

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pruyn v. Nelson Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API