Legal Opinion

Tylutki v. Tishman Technologies

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 17, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated July 17, 2003, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1) and denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On January 17, 2001, the plaintiff Jozef Tylutki (hereinafter the plaintiff), was struck and injured by a falling piece of sprinkler pipe while engaged in the demolition of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Salinas v. Barney Skanska Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Orner v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Van Eken v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Thomas v. 2 Overhill Road AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Keaney v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Petteys v. City of RomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API