Angelo v. Lang

The plaintiff brought action against James Lang and V. James Catania. The defendant Lang then cross-claimed against defendant 'Catania. A trial of the issues resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against both defendants. The cross claim asserted by the defendant Lang against the defendant Catania was dismissed.

*532The judgment entered in the above-entitled action provided for plaintiff’s recovery as found by the trial jury ‘against both defendants together with costs in the sum of $158. In addition, the judgment provided for costs in the sum of $150 in favor of the defendant Catania…