Legal Opinion

Gillead v. Fordham Hill Owners' Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 14, 1985No. 84 Civ. 8797 (RWS)Published

1Opinion of the Court

*531MEMORANDUM OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

This is a pro se § 1983 action seeking recovery for the alleged unconstitutional eviction of Ramon Gillead (“Gillead”) pursuant to a cooperative conversion plan authorized by Section 61 of the New York Rent Stabilization Code. Defendant E.T. Williams (“Williams”), the owner of the shares in Gillead’s apartment, has brought a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The motion is granted.

The court sympathizes with the frustrations of Gillead in his effort to retain possession of an apartment in which he had lived…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. BelcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Parrino v. LindsayNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Reiner-Kaiser Associates v. McConnachieCivil Court of the City of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API