Skakel v. Comm'r of Corr.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1DissentEspinosa, J.
The majority concludes that the habeas court properly granted the petition for **222*125a writ of habeas corpus filed by the petitioner, Michael Skakel, because his attorney at his criminal trial, Michael Sherman, provided ineffective assistance of counsel when he failed to follow up on a passing reference to a possible alibi witness by another witness, Georgeann Dowdle, during her grand jury testimony. The majority further concludes that there is a reasonable probability that, if not for this supposed deficient performance, the petitioner would have been acquitted. I agree with and join…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
- Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. TagerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.