Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hosp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.
“A request for attorney’s fees should not result in a second major litigation. Ideally of course, litigants will settle the amount of the fee.” Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 437, 103 S.Ct. 1933, 1941, 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983). Despite this Court’s hope that the parties would heed the Supreme Court’s admonition and settle their fee dispute, presently before this Court are the four fee petitions of Plaintiffs Terri Lee Halderman, et al. (“Halderman Plaintiffs”) for attorney’s fees and expenses from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cunningham v. City of McKeesportCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moore v. University of Notre DameDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1998
- Lambert v. Fulton County, Ga.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2000