Legal Opinion

Axe v. United States

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 13, 1961No. W-2005, W-2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Chief Judge.

These are actions for the refund of income taxes, penalties and interest for the calendar years 1953 and 1954.

All of the material facts have been stipulated.

The controversy arises from the sale of certain real estate in the years 1953 and 1954.

The taxpayers, Ruth Axe (formerly Ruth Wilson) and Marlene Fitch, are mother and daughter.

Prior to September 4, 1953, Ruth Axe held a life estate in 240 acres of land and improvements under the will of her grandfather, T. O. Tanton. On September 4, 1953, the taxpayer, Axe, and her daughter, Marlene Fitch, who held a contingent…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burnet v. LoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Bedell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  3. Johnston v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
  4. Bell's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  5. Nitterhouse v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Polkinhorn v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1970
  2. Bruce v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1966
  3. Polkinhorn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API