Legal Opinion

Bembry v. Pugh

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 1, 1988No. 75777PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Judge.

Appellee-plaintiff initiated this dispossessory action against appellant-defendant. Appellant was not present at the trial of the action due to his incarceration on unrelated criminal charges. Appellant’s counsel, however, elected to proceed without him. Appellant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for new trial.

Appellant’s sole enumeration is that his absence from the trial of the action necessitates that a new trial be conducted. Where, as here, “[c]ounsel goes to trial without the presence of the defendant, but makes no motion for a continuance and does not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burkhalter v. DurrenceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zappa v. AUTOMOTIVE PRECISION MACHINERY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. Goodman v. Lake Buckhorn Estates Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Beechridge Development Co. v. DahnersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API