Legal Opinion

Richards v. Steele Ex Rel. Stuart

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1938No. 3239Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing

William S. Boyle and Kendrick Johnson (of Counsel), for Appellant.

Clyde D. Souter, for Respondent.

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent has filed a petition for a rehearing, in which a theory is presented which was not suggested on the original hearing nor considered by the court in its opinion.

It was said, on petition for rehearing in the matter of Howard’s Estate, 48 Nev. 100, at page 107, 227 P. 1016, 232 P. 783: “It has been the universal practice to deny a petition for a rehearing when based upon a ground not urged upon the original hearing.”

In view of this well-established…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Howard's EstateNevada Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API