Legal Opinion

Sears v. Hassett

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 26, 1940No. Nos. 205, 103PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, District Judge.

These are two actions in which the plaintiffs seek the recovery of taxes alleged to have been erroneously assessed, collected, and retained. The first action involves the question whether the F. R. Sears Real Estate Trust is an association within the meaning of the Revenue Act of 1936, § 1001, 26 U.S.C.A. § 1696, and the second action involves the further question whether the F. R. Sears Real Estate Trust was “doing business”- between July 1, 1932, and June 30, 1936, within the meaning of section 701 of the Revenue Act of 1934, 26 U.S.C.A. § 1358. These cases were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Helvering v. Coleman-Gilbert AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Swanson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Edwards v. Chile Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paine v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1940
  2. Lovering v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API