Legal Opinion

St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Landers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 15, 1925No. 15960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

The parties to this action will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff, Warren Landers, instituted his action in the district court of Pontotoc county to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him while in defendant’s employ as a switchman. After issues had been joined, a trial was had resulting in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in the sum of $12,500. ■ Defendant’s moton for a new trial was overruled and exception reserved. Judgment was ■rendered in accordance with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. ProffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  5. Chitwood v. PalmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cushing Refining & Gasoline Co. v. DeshanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Kansas, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. DillonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API