Peters v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM LAUDERDALE. Appeal from Circuit Court of Lauderdale County. Thomas J. Flibpin, J.
1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.
The plaintiffs in error were indicted for, and upon trial were found guilty of, a violation of Sec. 1 of Ch. 127 of the Acts of 1895. This Act is entitled <cAn Act for the protection of fish in the State of Tennessee,” and by its first section makes it “ unlawful for any person or persons to catch, kill, or wound any ■ fish in any of the streams, lakes, rivers, or ponds in this State,” *684by ■ seine, etc., or “ in any way, ’ ’ etc., ‘ ‘except by rod or line or trot line.” It is provided, however, that “this section shall not apply to private ponds.”
The few facts necessary for the determination…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Magner v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ex parte FritzMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
- Gratz v. McKeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- State v. AshmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
- Gratz v. McKeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- Fritz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.