Legal Opinion
Ex parte Van Laeken
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 5, 1948No. 28339PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
On June 16, 1932, petitioner, a native of Belgium, was admitted to the United States at Honolulu, T. H., as a quota immigrant. Since that time he has followed his calling as a seaman, leaving and returning to this country on many foreign voyages. Upon his petition for naturalization, he was denied citizenship by this court on October 2, 1938. In re Van Laeken, 22 F.Supp. 145. Refusal of citizenship was on the ground that petitioner was attached to the principles- of Communism and was not attached to the principles of the Constitution. Upon the same grounds he was again…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Delgadillo v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Sing Tuck or King Do & Thirty-OneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States Ex Rel. Volpe v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States Ex Rel. Claussen v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States Ex Rel. Stapf v. CorsiSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- United States Ex Rel. Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding the Sir John FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Laeken v. WixonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1949