In re Giannini
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
*481ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11-328, concluding that respondent JOSEPH R. GIANNINI, formerly of CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be censured for violating RPC 3.1 (asserting frivolous issues), RPC 3.4(d) (making frivolous discovery requests), RPC 3.4(e) (in trial, alluding “to any matter that the lawyer does not reasonably believe is relevant or that will not be supported by admissible evidence”), and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);
And JOSEPH R. GIANNINI having…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hawkins v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Loigman v. TP. COMMITTEE OF MIDDLETOWNSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- Wright v. YurkoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- In re FitchettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005