Domville v. State

I concur in the majority’s denial of the state’s motion for rehearing. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s granting of the state’s motion for certification of a question of great public importance.

The majority does not provide its reasoning for its conclusion that the certified question is one of great public importance. The only reasoning for its conclusion appears to be stated in the concurring opinion. I disagree with the concurring opinion’s reasoning.

The concurring opinion reasons that the ability of judges to participate in social media with attorneys who appear before them “is…