Legal Opinion

Kahriman v. Fitzgerald

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 1927No. Docket No. 5226PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.

This was an action in replevin to recover an automobile. Defendant, as constable, levied an attachment upon the automobile in a suit by a creditor. Plaintiff herein claims against the defendant. and superior to the attaching creditor because of a chattel mortgage. Judgment was for defendant upon the ground that plaintiff’s chattel mortgage was void. The evidence showed the mortgage was executed in Fresno County and that thereafter the automobile was taken out of Fresno County and remained in Los Angeles County for more than thirty consecutive days. The mortgage was never recorded in Los…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hopper v. KeysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Washington Lumber & Millwork Co. v. McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. A. E. Mallagh, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Bankrupt Estate of Orville Stanford, Inc. v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. Sandhu v. MainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API