Legal Opinion

Young v. United States

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided February 11, 1985No. Civ. A. CA 3-83-0843-GPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

FISH, District Judge.

This tax refund suit is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. After considering the record in this case, the court is of the opinion that the government’s motion for partial summary judgment should be granted in part and denied in part but that the plaintiffs’ cross-motion should be denied in its entirety.

I. Legal Standard

Under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., summary judgment is appropriate only when the pleadings, depositions, affidavits, answers to interrogatories, and exhibits establish that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mazo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. Waymon Leon Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Roland J. Kalb v. United States of America, and Third-Party v.jerome L. Herold, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. J. A. Newsome, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. Ware v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. LandauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Tommy D. Morgan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. Turchon v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
  4. United States v. DavelDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1987
  5. Peterson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API