Legal Opinion
Bates v. State Ex Rel. Conniff
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 27, 1941No. 1 Div. 139PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
Petition for mandamus was filed by appellee to recover his share of the money derived by the City of Mobile from net profits of A. B. C. stores in Mobile as a result of the Alabama Alcoholic Bevérage Control Act and an act contained in the General Acts, of Alabama of 1939, pp. 526, 527, under an act of the Legislature contained in the General Acts of Alabama of 1936-37, Sp.Sess., pp. 244, 245.
The defendants filed an answer to the petition, admitting the allegations of the same, but denying that petitioner was entitled to the amount of $62.48, and setting up the defense that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City of Birmingham v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Wyman v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1838
- Heck v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Cook v. Meyer Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Mills v. Court of Com'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hyland v. BaumhauerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Lovett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
- Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Johnston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Mantell v. BaumhauerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.