Legal Opinion

OLMSTEAD ET UX. v. Olmstead

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1958No. 40821PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Chancery Court of Lauderdale County setting aside a deed executed by Mrs. Tabitha Olmstead to her son Clarence Olmstead and his wife Mrs. Lnra Olmstead.

The bill of complaint was filed on March 1, 1957, and seeks a cancellation of the deed in question solely on the ground that the defendants had promised in the deed and took the same subject to a covenant to support and care for the complainant for the duration of her life, and that the defendants had failed to do so and that such failure constituted a fraud upon the rights of complainant.

The deed in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gardner v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  2. Bourn v. BournMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Dixon v. MillingMississippi Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Day v. DavisMississippi Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Lee v. McMorriesMississippi Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. ReedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  2. Vega v. Estate of MullenMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  3. MANNING v. HammondMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Leggett v. GrahamMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Matter of Estate of VickMississippi Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API