Legal Opinion

United States v. Lewin

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 5, 1939No. 21063—LPublished

1Opinion of the Court

LOUDERBACK, District Judge.

The plaintiff moves to strike the defendant’s pleadings as specious and impertinent; for judgment on the pleadings because no defense is pleaded in the answer; and for summary judgment because the answer raises no issue of law or fact. *513There is presented on these motions, the complaint, the answer and amended answer, and affidavits.

The case involves an interpretation of the National Housing Act, which authorized the President “to create a Federal Housing Administration, all of the powers of which shall he exercised by a Federal Housing Administrator * * * ”. 12 U.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank v. ShinglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  2. Good Humor Corp. v. Popsicle Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1932
  3. Nease v. Coal & Coke Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1912
  4. Popsicle Corp. v. Good Humor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API