Legal Opinion

Holmes v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 15, 2010No. 09-208 CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Chief Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC) 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). The court has before it plaintiffs original Complaint (Original Complaint or Compl.) filed April 9, 2009, Docket Number (Dkt. No.) 1, plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (Amended Complaint or *313Am. Compl.) filed August 17, 2009, Dkt. No. 26, defendant’s Motion to Dismiss First…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Mata v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Speed v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Mata v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  5. Yisra'el Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API