Legal Opinion

Dale v. Dale

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 15, 1918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Woodruff Circuit Court, Northern District; J. M. Jackson, Judge; 1. Appellee should be charged with the $500 received from the Penn estate and $395.50 he received from the Hamblett estate. 124 Ark. 161. 2. It is agreed that by his last annual settlement appellee had in his hands as guardian $1,275.80 belonging to his ward.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Woodruff Circuit Court, Northern District; J. M. Jackson, Judge; 1. Appellee should be charged with the $500 received from the Penn estate and $395.50 he received from the Hamblett estate. 124 Ark. 161. 2. It is agreed that by his last annual settlement appellee had in his hands as guardian $1,275.80 belonging to his ward. The probate court never made any orders authorizing the expenditure of any money for his ward, nor is it shown to have been expended for maintenance or education. Kirby’s Dig., § 3792; 126 Ark. 579; 63 Id. 450; 83 Id. 223. 3. The testimony of Judge Summers and…

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

On September 21, 1916, the appellant, H. P. Dale, filed his petition in the probate court, praying that citation issue requiring the appellee, J. H. Dale, to file a final settlement as guardian of petitioner. It was conceded that no final settlement had been made and that the guardian had not been discharged, but it was alleged, in response to the prayer of appellant’s petition, that all funds which had come to the guardian’s hands had been accounted for and paid over to the petitioner,- and the final settlement which was filed along with the response to the petition showed a full and final…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Continental Insurance v. Estate of RowanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API