Hoover v. Rochester Printing Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, The Rochester Printing Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Monroe Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Monroe the 20th day-of November, 1895, as amended by an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 2d day of December, 1895, striking out. portions of the defendant’s answer to the plaintiff’s amended complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Ward, J. :
This is an action brought to "recover damages for libel alleged to have been published by the defendant, appellant, herein, the alleged libel being, in effect, that the plaintiff had been indicted upon the charge of intimidating witnesses. The answer of the defendant first denied each and every allegation of the complaint, and for a second and separate answer and defense the defendant “ repeats the denial hereinbefore contained,” and further alleged a justification of the alleged libel. A third answer by way of mitigation first repeated all of the denials before contained.
*12It appears…
2Cited by9 opinions
- D'Addario v. McNabNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Wallace v. FordNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Glens Falls Insurance v. WeissNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Kozak v. 244 East 2nd Realty, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- Heaberkorn v. MacraeNew York Supreme Court · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.