Vines v. Brazelton
Bath County Circuit Court
1Opinion of the Court
By JUDGE ROSCOE B. STEPHENSON, JR.
The issue presented is whether there must be a consideration in favor of a guarantor on a promissory note.
The defendant, Terrill Brazelton, contends that there must be such a consideration or the guaranty fails. He relies upon a number of Virginia cases, including Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Fisch, 141 Va. 261, 127 S.E. 187 (1925); Bourne v. Board of Supervisors, 161 Va. 678, 172 S.E. 245 (1934); Patterson v. Shaver, 165 Va. 298, 182 S.E. 261 (1935). These cases stand for the proposition that a guaranty is a separate contract which must be in writing and supported…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- B. F. Goodrich Rubber Co. v. FischSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
- Bourne v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Patterson v. ShaverSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935