Cooley v. Slocum

(concurring in part and dissenting in part) :

This case involves three issues which may be described briefly as (1) whether the dragline operator was a borrowed servant (2) whether Guinn is immune from suit because of his partnership status and (3) whether there is a claim against Maryland Casualty Company. As to the majority’s disposition of issues number one and three, I concur, but as to the affirmance of the summary judgment in favor of Guinn, I dissent.

I concur with the majority’s conclusion that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Slocum’s regularly employed dragline…