Legal Opinion

Oakland Jewish Center v. Isaacson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 21, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*762The arbitrators failed to follow the procedures set forth in CPLR article 75 (see, CPLR 7506, 7511 [b] [1] [iv]; Matter of Goldfinger v Lisker, 68 NY2d 225, 231), in that the appellant was not furnished written notice of the arbitration hearing, and the arbitration hearing was not conducted by all of the arbitrators. These violations, taken together, establish that the arbitration process was sufficiently unfair to warrant vacatur of the arbitration award (see, Matter of Gutman v Friedman, 170 AD2d 606). Accordingly, we direct a new arbitration hearing before different arbitrators (see, CPLR…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goldfinger v. LiskerNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Lawrence Terrace Co. v. BenovaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Gutman v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oakland Jewish Center v. IsaacsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API