Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 21, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 6, 1991, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was suspended from accumulating unemployment insurance benefit rights because his employment was terminated due to an industrial controversy.

Claimant’s case was reopened by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board for the sole purpose of determining whether there had been compliance with the consent judgment in Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin (683 F Supp 353). The Board, finding no substantial procedural violations, adhered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barcia v. SitkinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  2. In re Claim of DrassenowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. In re LynchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  4. In re the Claims Falco-WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ReardonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Matter of Parron (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API