Legal Opinion

State v. Affsprung

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1993No. 14027PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLACK, Judge.

Defendant appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to suppress. Following the denial of his motion to suppress, Defendant filed an application for interlocutory appeal. The issue on appeal is whether, following a brief visual inspection of a vehicle and limited questioning regarding the occupant’s residency and citizenship at a fixed immigration patrol checkpoint near the border, further detention may properly be based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. We hold reasonable suspicion is the proper standard, and affirm.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

We view the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. Montoya De HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. JohnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. Cardenas-AlvarezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. WaltersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. ClineNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. Porras-FuerteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. VargasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API