Legal Opinion

Terminix, Inc. v. Right Away Foods Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided May 18, 1989No. 13-87-549-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, Justice.

Terminix, Inc. and Terminix International, Inc. (Terminix) appeal a judgment against them and in favor of Right Away Foods Corporation (RAF), for damages resulting from Terminix’s fumigation of RAF’s packaging and food processing facilities with the chemical Phostoxin. A jury found that the damages were proximately caused by the gross negligence of Terminix and the ordinary negligence of the phostox-in supplier, Industrial Fumigants, and assigned the comparative degrees of negligence 80% to Terminix and 20% to Industrial Fumigants. The jury failed to find a third…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Dico Tire, Inc. v. Cisneros, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  3. Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1990
  4. General Mills Restaurants, Inc. v. ClemonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Harris v. CHI St. Luke's Health Baylor College of Medicine Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API