Legal Opinion

Security Mortgage Co. v. Herron

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 4, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). The act under which the drainage district was organized, special act No. 93 of 1917, provides how the delinquent assessment shall be collected by suit brought for the purpose, and that “proceedings and decrees shall be in the nature of proceedings in rem,” provides for the giving of notice of the pendency of the suit and the form of it, directs how the proceedings shall be conducted, about the decree and the sale and the making of the deed by the commissioner, and provides that “all deeds made by the commissioner, after the report of sale made bv him,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hampton v. HickeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  2. Simpson v. ReinmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  3. De Queen v. FentonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Vietz v. Hazen, Lagrue & Slovak Road Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  5. Boaz v. CoatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Board of Directors St. Francis Levee Dist. v. KurnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  2. Pinkert v. LambSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Security Mortgage Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Security Mortgage Co. v. MeeksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Howard, County Treas. v. Stafford, County JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API