Legal Opinion

United States v. Carey

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 20, 1925No. 2490PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The merchandise in this case is known by the trade name of “ Nova-delox.” Its immediate components are benzoyl peroxide, a deriva*25tive of coal tar, and calcium ph.osph.ate, which is not a coal-tar product. These two constituents, each in the form of a whitish powder of about the same shade of color, are mixed together, but not chemically united in any way, and in that condition imported. In weight, novadelox is composed of about 25 per centum benzoyl peroxide and 75 per centum calcium phosphate. Benzoyl peroxide is of much greater value per pound than calcium phosphate.

The collector assessed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Aetna Explosives Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Aetna Explosives Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API