Legal Opinion

State v. Broderick

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1879PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Sherwood, C. J. —

The defendant was indicted for the larceny of three mules, and on trial had, the jury returned the following verdict: “ We, the jury in the case of the State of Missouri v. Martin Broderick and John Texas alias Charles H. Shobe, do find the defendant John Texas alms Charles H. Shobe not guilty of grand larceny as charged in the indictment. And we further find the defendant Martin Broderick guilty of embezzlement, and assess his punishment at two years in the penitentiary.”

1. bill of exceptions; judicial notice. It is beyond our power to notice either the evidence or the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bateson v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  2. State v. JefforsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  3. State v. PorterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  4. State v. StoneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  5. State v. DuckworthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HarmonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Grabow v. McCracken Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. State ex rel. Modern Woodmen of America v. BroaddusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  5. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API