Legal Opinion

Soule Mill, Inc. v. Lockset Screening Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 9, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

This action of contract is to recover for services in weaving and processing yarn of the defendant into finished material. The defendant’s bill of exceptions states that “the defendant was given leave to file a special answer in avoidance setting forth a plea of res judicata; and the defendant was relieved from filing any further answer until after final decision on the defence of said plea of res judicata.” The judge disallowed the “plea” and directed the defendant to file an answer forthwith.

*386Both briefs state that the defendant waived all other defences in the lower court. But this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rines v. Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  2. Bean v. 399 Boylston Street, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  3. Driscoll v. BattistaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hertz Furniture Systems Corp. v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1988
  2. Marshall v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API