State v. Sellars
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Under the rationale of State v. Brimmer, any prolonged detention of defendant for the purpose of a drug dog-sniff of defendant’s vehicle was de minimis, and did not violate defendant’s constitutional rights.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
The State appeals the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion to suppress the drugs seized during a traffic stop of William Sellers (“defendant”) that occurred on 16 September 2010 in Forsyth County. The factual background is derived from the trial court’s findings of fact.1
Detective P.L. McKaughan and Officer K.L. Jones of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CottrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- State of Arizona v. Rusty James DriscollCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Sellars v. NorthcarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015