Legal Opinion

Forsyth v. Heege

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis County Circuit Court.—Hour. Rudolph Hirzel, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.

—This is a proceeding by mandamus to compel the defendants, as justices of the county court of St. Louis county, to draw a warrant on the treasurer of the county for the amount of damages assessed to plaintiff for opening a public road through his land. The court sustained a demurrer to the return, and, the defendants refusing to plead further, a peremptory writ of mandamus was ordered to be issued. The defendants have appealed, and claim that the demurrer was improperly sustained for the reason, among others, that the return put in issue material allegations of fact.

The averments in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Strahan v. County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Howell v. Jackson CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  2. Galbraith v. PrenticeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API